An Unexpected Turn in the Andic Case
The tragic death of Isak Andic, founder of Mango, has taken a new direction following the presentation of an expert report suggesting that his death in Montserrat may have been the result of an accidental fall. The defence of his son, Jonathan Andic, has argued that the circumstances of the incident on December 14, 2024, are consistent with a series of previous falls suffered by the businessman.
The legal team led by Cristobal Martell has conducted an exhaustive recreation of the accident using advanced technology. For this, mannequins equipped with sensors and drones were employed to capture every detail of the event on the Camí de les Feixades. According to expert Francisco Marco, the injuries observed in the autopsy match the predictions made during this reconstruction.
Marco concludes that Isak Andic suffered a sudden loss of balance, which prevented him from reacting appropriately to the fall. This finding is crucial for the defence, as it reinforces their argument regarding the accidental nature of the incident.
The defence has also sought medical support to substantiate their claims. Experts from the Complutense University have diagnosed Isak Andic with bilateral gonarthrosis and a documented neuromotor disability, conditions that could have contributed to his inability to prevent the fall. However, this diagnosis was not mentioned in the initial reports prepared by the Mossos d’Esquadra or in the body recovery.
Despite this, witnesses have stated they saw Isak applying ice to his knees before going out for a walk with his son, which could indicate a compromised physical state.
The report prepared by Método 3 is included as an integral part of the appeal submitted to the Barcelona Court. The defence seeks to dismiss the incriminating evidence presented by investigators, asserting that there is insufficient evidence to support that Jonathan Andic had any active participation in his father's death.
Cristobal Martell has prepared an extensive legal document, detailing over 80 pages dedicated to refuting each of the points raised by the Mossos d’Esquadra. The legal strategy appears to focus on demonstrating that the circumstances surrounding the death are more complex and less straightforward than initially assumed.
You may also like
